1972 BMW 520 vs. 2003 Holden UTE

To start off, 2003 Holden UTE is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW 520 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1972 BMW 520. (113 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1972 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Holden UTE weights approximately 270 kg more than 1972 BMW 520. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW 520. (165 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2003 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW 520.

Compare all specifications:

1972 BMW 520 2003 Holden UTE
Make BMW Holden
Model 520 UTE
Year Released 1972 2003
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1989 cc 3791 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 113 HP 204 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 165 Nm 305 Nm
Torque RPM 3700 RPM 3600 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1230 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 4630 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2950 mm