1972 BMW 520 vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW 520 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1972 BMW 520. (113 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1972 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1192 kg more than 1972 BMW 520. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW 520. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW 520 | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 520 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 2422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |