1972 BMW 520 vs. 2009 Dodge Charger

To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW 520 would be higher. At 2,735 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (178 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1972 BMW 520. (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1972 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 898 kg more than 1972 BMW 520. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW 520. (190 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW 520. 2009 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1972 BMW 520 has manual transmission. 1972 BMW 520 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1972 BMW 520 2009 Dodge Charger
Make BMW Dodge
Model 520 Charger
Year Released 1972 2009
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 2735 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 150 HP 178 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 258 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 66 mm 78 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 9.7:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1445 kg 2343 kg
Vehicle Length 4630 mm 5090 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 3050 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.3 L/100km 9.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 12.4 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.2 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]