1972 BMW 520 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW 520 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW 520 (150 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 1972 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 BMW 520 (190 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1972 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW 520 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 520 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2685 mm |