1972 BMW 520 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW 520 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW 520 (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW 520. (190 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW 520 | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | 520 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 211 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 65 L |