1972 BMW M1 vs. 1996 Lancia Kappa
To start off, 1996 Lancia Kappa is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW M1 would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW M1 (273 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1996 Lancia Kappa. (122 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW M1 should accelerate faster than 1996 Lancia Kappa.
Because 1972 BMW M1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW M1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lancia Kappa (270 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW M1. (177 Nm). This means 1996 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW M1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 BMW M1 | 1996 Lancia Kappa | |
| Make | BMW | Lancia |
| Model | M1 | Kappa |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2387 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
