1972 BMW M1 vs. 1997 Rover 400
To start off, 1997 Rover 400 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW M1 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 BMW M1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW M1 (273 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1997 Rover 400. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW M1 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 400.
Because 1972 BMW M1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW M1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Rover 400 (182 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW M1. (177 Nm). This means 1997 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW M1.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW M1 | 1997 Rover 400 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | M1 | 400 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 182 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |