1972 BMW M1 vs. 1998 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 1998 Toyota Sienna is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW M1 would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW M1 (273 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1998 Toyota Sienna. (189 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW M1 should accelerate faster than 1998 Toyota Sienna.
Because 1972 BMW M1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW M1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Toyota Sienna (279 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW M1. (177 Nm). This means 1998 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW M1. 1998 Toyota Sienna has automatic transmission and 1972 BMW M1 has manual transmission. 1972 BMW M1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Toyota Sienna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW M1 | 1998 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | M1 | Sienna |
Year Released | 1972 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 279 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |