1972 BMW M1 vs. 2000 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2000 Cadillac XLR is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW M1 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac XLR (301 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1972 BMW M1. (273 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1972 BMW M1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac XLR (428 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW M1. (177 Nm). This means 2000 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW M1. 2000 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 1972 BMW M1 has manual transmission. 1972 BMW M1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 BMW M1 | 2000 Cadillac XLR | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M1 | XLR |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 428 Nm |
| Top Speed | 265 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
