1972 BMW M1 vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW M1 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW M1 (273 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW M1 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 626.
Because 2000 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 BMW M1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda 626 (392 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW M1. (177 Nm). This means 2000 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW M1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 BMW M1 | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | M1 | 626 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 392 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
