1972 BMW M1 vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW M1 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 BMW M1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW M1 (273 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2003 Volvo S40. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW M1 should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo S40.
Because 1972 BMW M1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW M1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 BMW M1 (177 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo S40. (166 Nm). This means 1972 BMW M1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 BMW M1 | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | M1 | S40 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Top Speed | 265 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
