1972 BMW M1 vs. 2004 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW M1 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 BMW M1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW M1 (273 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW M1 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 BMW M1 (177 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm). This means 1972 BMW M1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW M1 | 2004 Ford Econovan | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M1 | Econovan |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 138 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |