1972 BMW M1 vs. 2004 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2004 Kia Sedona is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW M1 would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW M1 (273 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2004 Kia Sedona. (195 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW M1 should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Sedona.
Because 1972 BMW M1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW M1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Sedona (296 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW M1. (177 Nm). This means 2004 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW M1.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW M1 | 2004 Kia Sedona | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | M1 | Sedona |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 3490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 296 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |