1972 BMW M1 vs. 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW M1 would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW M1 (273 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (150 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW M1 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Because 1972 BMW M1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW M1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager (218 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW M1. (177 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW M1.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW M1 | 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | M1 | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 218 Nm |
Top Speed | 265 km/hour | 183 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |