1972 BMW M1 vs. 2006 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW M1 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW M1 (273 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2006 Honda CR-V. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW M1 should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda CR-V.
Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 BMW M1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Honda CR-V (192 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW M1. (177 Nm). This means 2006 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW M1. 2006 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1972 BMW M1 has manual transmission. 1972 BMW M1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW M1 | 2006 Honda CR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | M1 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 192 Nm |
Top Speed | 265 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |