1972 BMW M1 vs. 2010 Mazda 5
To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW M1 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW M1 (273 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 5. (153 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW M1 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 5.
Because 1972 BMW M1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW M1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 5 (200 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW M1. (177 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW M1. 2010 Mazda 5 has automatic transmission and 1972 BMW M1 has manual transmission. 1972 BMW M1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW M1 | 2010 Mazda 5 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M1 | 5 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |