1972 BMW M1 vs. 2011 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2011 Suzuki Equator is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW M1 would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW M1 (273 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2011 Suzuki Equator. (262 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW M1 should accelerate faster than 2011 Suzuki Equator.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW M1. (177 Nm). This means 2011 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW M1. 2011 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1972 BMW M1 has manual transmission. 1972 BMW M1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 BMW M1 | 2011 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | BMW | Suzuki |
| Model | M1 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 3954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 262 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 381 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
