1972 BMW Turbo vs. 1975 Dodge Aspen
To start off, 1975 Dodge Aspen is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW Turbo would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Dodge Aspen (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1972 BMW Turbo. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Dodge Aspen should accelerate faster than 1972 BMW Turbo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 556 kg more than 1972 BMW Turbo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Dodge Aspen (333 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW Turbo. (177 Nm). This means 1975 Dodge Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 BMW Turbo | 1975 Dodge Aspen | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | Turbo | Aspen |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 333 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2870 mm |
