1972 BMW Turbo vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW Turbo would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 BMW Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 BMW Turbo weights approximately 174 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1972 BMW Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW Turbo | 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | BMW | Mitsubishi |
Model | Turbo | Colt |
Year Released | 1972 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2310 mm |