1972 BMW Turbo vs. 1983 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1983 Jaguar XJR is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW Turbo would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 BMW Turbo weights approximately 84 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW Turbo | 1983 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | Turbo | XJR |
Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2870 mm |