1972 BMW Turbo vs. 1993 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 1993 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW Turbo would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 BMW Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1972 BMW Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW Turbo | 1993 Mazda MX-3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | Turbo | MX-3 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2460 mm |