1972 BMW Turbo vs. 1999 Nissan XVL

To start off, 1999 Nissan XVL is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW Turbo would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan XVL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan XVL (156 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1972 BMW Turbo. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan XVL should accelerate faster than 1972 BMW Turbo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan XVL weights approximately 276 kg more than 1972 BMW Turbo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 BMW Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan XVL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan XVL (310 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW Turbo. (177 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan XVL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW Turbo. 1999 Nissan XVL has automatic transmission and 1972 BMW Turbo has manual transmission. 1972 BMW Turbo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan XVL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: