1972 BMW Turbo vs. 2010 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW Turbo would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1972 BMW Turbo. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1972 BMW Turbo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ranger weights approximately 680 kg more than 1972 BMW Turbo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 BMW Turbo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW Turbo. (177 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW Turbo.

Compare all specifications:

1972 BMW Turbo 2010 Ford Ranger
Make BMW Ford
Model Turbo Ranger
Year Released 1972 2010
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 4000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 129 HP 207 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 177 Nm 322 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 984 kg 1664 kg
Vehicle Length 4150 mm 5171 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1811 mm
Vehicle Height 1110 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 3198 mm