1972 BMW Turbo vs. 2012 Holden Barina
To start off, 2012 Holden Barina is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW Turbo would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 BMW Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1972 BMW Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Barina (197 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW Turbo. (177 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Barina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW Turbo | 2012 Holden Barina | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | Turbo | Barina |
Year Released | 1972 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 177 Nm | 197 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |