1972 Bristol 411 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1972 Bristol 411 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Bristol 411 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Bristol 411 (288 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Bristol 411 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Bristol 411 weights approximately 515 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Bristol 411 (588 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1972 Bristol 411 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Bristol 411 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Bristol | Triumph |
| Model | 411 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6276 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 588 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2700 mm |
