1972 Bristol 411 vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Bristol 411. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Bristol 411 would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Bristol 411 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Bristol 411 (288 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2000 Lotus M250. (176 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Bristol 411 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus M250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Bristol 411 weights approximately 1035 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Bristol 411 (588 Nm) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 1972 Bristol 411 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Bristol 411 | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Bristol | Lotus |
| Model | 411 | M250 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6276 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 588 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2520 mm |
