1972 Buick GS vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Buick GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Buick GS would be higher. At 5,723 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Buick GS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1972 Buick GS. (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1972 Buick GS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Buick GS weights approximately 93 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6.
Because 1972 Buick GS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Buick GS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Buick GS (394 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (257 Nm). This means 1972 Buick GS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Buick GS | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | GS | 6 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5723 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 394 Nm | 257 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2680 mm |