1972 Buick Skylark vs. 2004 Caterham 7

To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 5,722 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1972 Buick Skylark. (150 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1972 Buick Skylark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Buick Skylark weights approximately 1135 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Buick Skylark (366 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Caterham 7. (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Caterham 7.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Buick Skylark 2004 Caterham 7
Make Buick Caterham
Model Skylark 7
Year Released 1972 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5722 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 150 HP 251 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 8000 RPM
Torque 366 Nm 258 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1605 kg 470 kg
Vehicle Length 5170 mm 3110 mm
Vehicle Width 1960 mm 1580 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2230 mm