1972 Buick Skylark vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 5,722 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1972 Buick Skylark. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1972 Buick Skylark.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Buick Skylark (366 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Colorado. (360 Nm). This means 1972 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Colorado. 2010 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1972 Buick Skylark has manual transmission. 1972 Buick Skylark will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Buick Skylark | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | Skylark | Colorado |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5722 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 366 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |