1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 1963 BMW 3200 CS
To start off, 1972 Cadillac Calais is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. (160 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 630 kg more than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Cadillac Calais | 1963 BMW 3200 CS | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | Calais | 3200 CS |
Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3169 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2840 mm |