1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 1972 Cadillac Calais is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1964 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Cadillac Calais | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Calais | 120 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2610 mm |
