1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1972 Cadillac Calais is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (267 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1972 Cadillac Calais. (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1972 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 355 kg more than 1966 Mercury Comet.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Cadillac Calais | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
| Model | Calais | Comet |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 6393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 267 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1775 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 5000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2950 mm |
