1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1972 Cadillac Calais is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL. (150 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 770 kg more than 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Cadillac Calais | 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Calais | SL |
Year Released | 1972 | 1968 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2410 mm |