1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Cadillac Calais | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | Calais | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 81 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2450 mm |