1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 1996 Proton 300 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1996 Proton 300. (88 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1996 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Cadillac Calais | 1996 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Proton |
| Model | Calais | 300 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1468 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2450 mm |
