1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (134 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 630 kg more than 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Cadillac Calais | 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Calais | CLK |
Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2720 mm |