1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 1999 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 1999 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz ML (342 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1972 Cadillac Calais. (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1972 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 100 kg more than 1972 Cadillac Calais. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Cadillac Calais | 1999 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Calais | ML |
Year Released | 1972 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 5439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 342 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 2230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2860 mm |