1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1972 Cadillac Calais. (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1972 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 652 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Calais | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2580 mm |
