1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2003 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Thunderbird (249 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1972 Cadillac Calais. (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1972 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 385 kg more than 2003 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Calais | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3934 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 249 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2730 mm |