1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1972 Cadillac Calais. (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1972 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 345 kg more than 2003 Mercedes-Benz E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Calais | E |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2860 mm |
