1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. (141 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 760 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Calais | Magna |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2730 mm |