1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Volkswagen Bora
To start off, 2003 Volkswagen Bora is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2003 Volkswagen Bora. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2003 Volkswagen Bora. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 935 kg more than 2003 Volkswagen Bora. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Volkswagen Bora | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
| Model | Calais | Bora |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2520 mm |
