1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2003 Volvo V50. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 692 kg more than 2003 Volvo V50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Calais | V50 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1438 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2760 mm |