1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 2004 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2004 Chrysler 300 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 395 kg more than 2004 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Cadillac Calais | 2004 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | Calais | 300 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 5010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3040 mm |