1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 710 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Cadillac Calais | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Calais | 6 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1839 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2680 mm |
