1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (493 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 1972 Cadillac Calais. (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1972 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 150 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Cadillac Calais | 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Calais | SL |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 5439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 493 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2570 mm |