1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 965 kg more than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Cadillac Calais | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
| Model | Calais | Polo |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1422 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 3900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2410 mm |
