1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1972 Cadillac Calais. (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1972 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 308 kg more than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Cadillac Calais | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | Calais | XF |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2908 mm |
