1972 Cadillac Calais vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (464 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1972 Cadillac Calais. (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1972 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 260 kg more than 2013 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Cadillac Calais | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | Calais | XJ |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 464 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 5252 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3157 mm |