1972 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1996 Ford Falcon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Falcon (228 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1972 Cadillac DeVille. (211 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1972 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 545 kg more than 1996 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3707 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5830 mm | 4910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2800 mm |
